qxzilbop

Refuge Lieptgas / Georg Nickisch + Selina Walder

first_imgArchDaily CopyCabins & Lodges, Houses•Flims, Switzerland Refuge Lieptgas / Georg Nickisch + Selina Walder Cabins & Lodges “COPY” Refuge Lieptgas / Georg Nickisch + Selina WalderSave this projectSaveRefuge Lieptgas / Georg Nickisch + Selina Walder ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/606567/refugi-lieptgas-architektin-aam Clipboard 2012 Photographs:  Gaudenz Danuser, Ralph Feiner, NuwArchitect In Charge:Selina Walder, Georg NickischEngineer:Reto WalderClient:Guido Casty, FlimsCity:FlimsCountry:SwitzerlandMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© Gaudenz DanuserRecommended ProductsDoorsSky-FrameInsulated Sliding Doors – Sky-Frame ArcDoorsAir-LuxPivoting DoorWoodGustafsWood Veneered Wall & Ceiling PanelsDoorspanoramah!®ah! PivotText description provided by the architects. The refuge Lieptgas stands where in the past a wooden structure served as a shelter to the farming people. In front of the hut, a small path leads into the forest of Flims, next to it the sculpture of a hollowed dead woodpecker tree. Opposite there is a stable, together they are forming a kind of a gate into the forest. Both buildings – cabin and stable – were abandoned, about to decline. The formerly inhabited part of the ensemble could have been converted and replaced by new construction. The character of the place had to be preserved.Save this picture!© Ralph FeinerThe new hut now stands as petrification of the abandoned structure in exactly the same place. The timber log construction of the old cabin was used as the formwork, the walls were cast massively in insulating concrete. The surface is rough, nature will soon reconquer the artifact.
Save this picture!© Gaudenz DanuserSave this picture!SectionSave this picture!© NuwThe archetype form of the house defines the space of the upper floor. A fireplace in the back wall, an eating area at a window with a view into a clearing of the woods, a small kitchen, a heated concrete bench from which one looks through a round roof light into the crown of a big beech tree. A sinuous staircase leads to the underground. Here in silence one sleeps. A big rock dominates the space, crepuscular light falls throughout the gap between rock and house. In front of the window, a bathtub incorporated in a big heated concrete plinth. A door leads outside.Save this picture!© Ralph FeinerSave this picture!Floor PlanSave this picture!© Ralph FeinerProject gallerySee allShow lessInterview: Büro Ole Scheeren Unveils Designs for Guardian Art Center in BeijingInterviewsINES – French National Solar Energy Institute / Atelier Michel Rémon + Agence Frédé…Selected Projects Share Year: center_img “COPY” Projects Switzerland ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/606567/refugi-lieptgas-architektin-aam Clipboard Architects: Georg Nickisch, Selina Walder Year Completion year of this architecture project Photographs Save this picture!© Gaudenz Danuser+ 16 Share CopyAbout this officeSelina WalderOfficeFollowGeorg NickischOfficeFollowProductConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsHospitality ArchitectureLodgingCabins & LodgesResidential ArchitectureHousesFlimsSwitzerlandPublished on March 09, 2015Cite: “Refuge Lieptgas / Georg Nickisch + Selina Walder” 09 Mar 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Browse the CatalogSinkshansgroheBathroom Mixers – FocusGlass3MInterior Finishes at U.S. Bank StadiumPartitionsSkyfoldMarkerboard Finish for Folding WallsFiber Cements / CementsSwisspearlFiber Cement Cladding Panels in B66 Business CenterMembranesEffisusFaçade Protection – Breather+Metal PanelsSculptformClick-on Battens in WestConnex M8 JunctionPanels / Prefabricated AssembliesBruagBack-Ventilated Facades – CELLONTiles / Mosaic / GresiteMargresPorcelain Tiles – Linea CosmosGlassDip-TechCeramic Printing for Public TransportationAcousticSchöckStaircase Insulation – Tronsole®Porcelain StonewareApavisaSlabs – Wild ForestBulbs / SpotsAmbiance LumiereLighting – ZetaMore products »Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

dqolfdph

Orissa High Court Disposes Of PIL For Waiver Of School Fees During Covid-19, Based On MoU Submitted By Institutions For Flat Rate Concession

News UpdatesOrissa High Court Disposes Of PIL For Waiver Of School Fees During Covid-19, Based On MoU Submitted By Institutions For Flat Rate Concession LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK11 Jan 2021 10:56 PMShare This – xThe Orissa High Court on Thursday disposed of a batch of PILs seeking waiver of school fees levied by private unaided schools in the State, in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic from March, 2020 onwards. The matter was closed after 14 private unaided schools submitted before the Bench of Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Dr. Justice B. R. Sarangi, a MoU for waiver of fees at a flat rate…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Orissa High Court on Thursday disposed of a batch of PILs seeking waiver of school fees levied by private unaided schools in the State, in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic from March, 2020 onwards. The matter was closed after 14 private unaided schools submitted before the Bench of Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Dr. Justice B. R. Sarangi, a MoU for waiver of fees at a flat rate in different slabs mentioned therein. Terms of MoU The MoU contemplates waiver of maximum 26% Tution/ composite fee for institutions where fees is above Rs. 1 lakh per annum. Similarly, there a separate slab rates, based on the fee amount. All schools charging fees upto Rs. 6,000/- shall not be liable to offer any waiver.The institutions have decided to waive of ‘Other Optional Fees’ till reopening of schools. However, the charges on Transport and Food shall remain as per actual. There is a flat waiver of 30% on Hostel fees. The Bench said, “this Court is not persuaded to further issue directions in the matter in light of the MOU arrived at between 14 educational institutions in Odisha on the question of fee waiver during the period of the Covid-19 pandemic.” It has however clarified that if any party to the MoU faces any problem in relation its terms, the same may be agitated in separate proceedings and examined on a case to case basis. “While this Court has recorded the fact of the MOU having been entered into, this will not preclude individual institutions or parties, who may be aggrieved or who may have a different point of view than that recorded in the MOU, or seek strict enforcement of the terms and conditions of recognition or grant of NOC as set out in the Resolution dated 23rd September 1996, from seeking appropriate reliefs in separate proceedings as are permissible to them in accordance with law,” the order stated. The development comes after the State Government expressed its inability to intervene in the matter as there is no provision under the Orissa Education Act, 1969 (‘OE Act’) and the Rules framed thereunder for fixation of fee structure of different unaided schools. The Government also stated that it has no objection if the Court accepts the MoU and passes appropriate directions. It referred to the case of DAV College Managing Committee v. Laxminarayan Mishra, whereby the Supreme Court accepted the recommendations of the Fee Structure Committee, Odisha, for fixation of fees for DAV School. It is pertinent to note here that certain minority institutions had expressed apprehensions with respect to the terms of the MoU. However, the Court refused to entertain the same, stating, “The problems faced by any of the parties in relation to any of the terms of the MOU will have to be agitated in other separate proceedings and examined on a case by case basis. No omnibus directions in that regard can possibly be issued at this stage.” Case Title: Mohammed Mustaq Ansari v. State of Odisha & Anr. Click Here To Download Order Read OrderNext Story read more